Physical activity with cerebral palsy
- 2 to 3 per 1,000 live births (commonest cause of motor disability in childhood)
- Increases to 40 to 100 per 1,000 live births in premature babies and those of a low or very low birth weight (Sewell et al, 2014)
- Estimated 1 in 400 babies
- ONS figures indicate that out of ~700, 000 babies born each year in England and Wales there may be 1,700 new cases of cerebral palsy each year (Cerebral Palsy UK, 2020)
- 3 in 4 experience pain
- 1 in 2 have an intellectual impairment
- 1 in 3 unable to walk
- 1 in 4 unable to talk
- 1 in 4 has bladder control problems
- 1 in 4 has epilepsy
- 1 in 4 has a behaviour disorder
- 1 in 5 has sleep disorder
- 1 in 5 has saliva control problems
- 1 in 10 has a severe vision impairment
- Brain injury can occur prenatally, perinatally or up to two years old (due to continuing brain development).
Prenatally
(70 to 80% of cases) |
Neonatal risk factors |
Postnatal
(10 to 20% of cases) |
·
Causes largely unknown |
·
Birth before 32 weeks gestation ·
Birth weight of less than 5lb 8oz ·
Intrauterine growth retardation ·
Intracranial haemorrhage ·
Trauma |
·
Bacterial meningitis ·
Viral encephalitis ·
Hyperbilirubinemia ·
Motor vehicle collisions ·
Falls ·
Child abuse |
- Health care professionals may fail to monitor for appropriate respond to signs of fetal distress (signs that baby is deprived of oxygen and is likely in need for an emergency C-section)
- Deviating for standard of care for a high-risk pregnancy
- Inducing labour when it is not safe to do so
- Using birth-assisting tools e.g. Forceps and vacuum extractors (Nobakht et al., 2013)
- Made on clinical grounds after taking a detailed antenatal and family history and carrying out a full examination
- Failure of children to achieve expected milestones in motor development in the presence of abnormal movement or muscle tone (excessive stiffness or floppiness) is characteristic
Information from
Table 1 Expected milestones in motor development that may be abnormal in
neurodevelopment conditions (Sewell et al, 2014, p.10)
Surveillance of Cerebral Palsy in Europe
·
Recommends describing the distribution
(unilateral or bilateral) of motor symptoms and classifies the main motor types
into four groups: spastic, dyskinetic, ataxic and mixed.
·
Classification of tone and movement
abnormality |
|
Spastic |
·
Velocity dependent increased tone with
hyperreflexia and upper motor neurone signs ·
Tone increased but not necessarily constant |
Dyskinetic |
·
Recurring, uncontrolled and involuntary
movements ·
Tone abnormally varies May be ·
Dystonic: characterised by
hypokinesia (reduced activity) and hypertonia (increased tone) resulting in
stiff movements ·
Choreoathetotic: characterised
by hyperkinesia (increased activity) and hypotonia (reduced tone) resulting
in uncoordinated writhing and jerky movements |
Ataxic |
·
Generalised hypotonia with loss of muscle
coordination ·
Characterised by abnormal force, rhythm and
control or accuracy of movement |
Mixed forms |
·
No one tone abnormality and movement disorder
predominates ·
Commonest mixed type = combination of
spasticity and dyskinesia |
(Sewell et al, 2014)
Gross Motor Functional Classification System (GMFCS)
An aged dependent classification system that groups children
into one of five levels based on their ability to mobilise by reflecting their
overall gross motor skills and severity of their motor impairment.
Summary of gross motor function by level |
|
Level I |
Walks without limitations |
Level II |
Walks without assistive devices, but with limitations (e.g. walking
long distances, balancing and using the stairs) |
Level III |
Walks using a hand-held mobility device (e.g. K-walker frame or
crutch) |
Level IV |
Limited self-mobility, child may use powered mobility independently
(e.g. operating a joystick activated powered wheelchair |
Level V |
Child transported in a manual wheelchair; severely limited
self-mobility even with powered assistive devices; child unable to operate a
joystick activated powered wheelchair |
(Sewell et al, 2014)
Lindsay (2015)’s Literature Review
Synthesised the experiences and perspectives of youth
(children and young adults) living with cerebral palsy to inform the
development of rehabilitation and social programmes. To achieve this, she used
33 articles involving a total of 390 participants aged from 2 to 25 years old
from six countries (Sweden, Canada, Australia, UK, US and Netherlands). She collated
the information into the following themes: body structure and function; activity;
personal factors; mental health; environment; participation; school and learning;
work and civic engagement. These themes are discussed in this section and
section 2.
Body structure and function
·
Youth from 14 studies reported experiencing
constant pain as a feeling of muscle soreness that permeated their lives
·
Pain often located in the hips, back, bladder
and upper limbs
·
Some who were often in pain, did not always tell
their parents because they did not want to worry them
·
Some described their muscles ‘feeling like
jelly’
·
Other expressed frustration with fatigue and
limited physical functioning
·
Some reported managing their physical
limitations by adapting or restricting their activity
Activity
·
Reported many activities of daily living (e.g.
bathing) were challenging but manageable
·
Pain and fatigue often restricted activities of
youth, including their ability to be mobile and participate in typical
activities of daily living
·
Expressed frustration with struggling to walk
and often experienced stigma while using an assistive device
·
Some described their assistive devices (e.g. walkers,
wheelchairs) as playing an important role in helping them to be more
independent and engaging in activities with peers
Verschuren et al (2012)
Explored the facilitators and barriers to participation in
physical activity in youth with cerebral palsy. They used semi-structured focus
groups (children’s and parents’ were separate) with 33 ambulatory youths (18
boys and 15 girls; aged from 7 to 17 years who could walk independently unaided
and were able to respond to interview questions) from 5 special education
schools in the Netherlands and their parents (aged from 32 to 54 years; 31
mothers and 2 fathers). The participants were asked a general question about
the children’s most recent experiences with physical activity, then discussed
the facilitators and barriers to this.
Youth participants
Sport |
No. of participants |
Participated in regular sport more
than once a week Active in segregated programs for
children with disabilities Members of a community football club
with typical developing peers No sport |
6 4 2 21 |
Findings
·
For children who can walk independently,
strengthening and exercise programs are recommended to reverse deconditioning
secondary to impaired mobility and to optimise physical functioning and
enhances overall well being
·
“Several factors should be considered when
matching the child to the right sport, including the child’s current health
status and physical abilities, the child’s psychological maturity, the level of
competition and position played, adaptive and protective equipment,
modification of the sport, and the parents’ and child’s understanding of the
inherent risks of injury.”
PERSONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL BARRIERS
AND FACILITATORS OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS |
|
Personal barriers |
Personal facilitators |
Physical abilities of the child ·
Lack of energy/fatigue ·
Feeling an attractive sport is too difficult ·
Having the opinion that being active is not
good for the body ·
Pain (in general and during exercise) ·
Fear of increased risk of an injury ·
Learning the required motor skill is too time consuming Child-related psychological factors ·
Attitude (decreased motivation) of the child ·
Feeling like an outsider ·
Feeling insecure or ashamed ·
Child does not accept the (extent of their)
disability ·
Presence of a cognitive impairment ·
Perception of physical activity and sports as
not being ‘fun’ |
Physical abilities of the child ·
Perception of relaxation as a benefit of
exercise ·
Belief that symmetrical movement is beneficial ·
Belief that exercise has health benefits Child-related psychological factors ·
Desire to be active ·
Positive attitude towards being challenged ·
Acceptance of the disability ·
Views sports and physical activity as an
opportunity for social interaction ·
Having perseverance ·
Feels accepted as part of a group ·
Feels confident about him or herself ·
Experiences enjoyment ·
Views exercise as an opportunity to ‘clear the
mind’ |
Environmental barriers |
Environmental facilitators |
Parental factors ·
Parent not accepting the extent of the
disability ·
Parental dissatisfaction with the environment
(eg, facility too remote or unclean) ·
Fear of child not fitting in (ie, not being
accepted by the other children, motor tasks too challenging, or poor fit
between their child and the activity) ·
Parental challenges with observing the child
struggling with sport (ie, losing) ·
Challenges with managing the day-to-day
aspects of raising a child with a disability ·
Opinion that physical activity and sport are
unimportant ·
Hesitating to ask a trainer (volunteer) to
support their child Opportunities for sport and physical activity ·
Lack of opportunities ·
Lack of awareness of possibilities ·
Not knowing what “suits” the child Practical feasibility ·
Lack of access to transportation ·
Lack of time ·
Financial restrictions ·
Time of training is inconvenient Social environment ·
Not being accepted by peers ·
Not being accepted by other parents ·
Being bullied Facility/program factors ·
Trainer often not aware of the complexity of
the child ·
Teams are too big ·
Not “open” for children with disabilities ·
Waiting list ·
Child is not allowed to play matches ·
Being underestimated ·
No team that “suits” the child (level and age) |
Parental factors ·
Parental awareness of the benefits of physical
activity ·
Parental perseverance (in exploring sport
options/adaptations) ·
Parental assertiveness (in advocating for their
child) ·
Having a positive attitude Opportunities for sport and physical activity ·
Awareness of opportunities for sport and
physical activity (eg, through clinics) ·
School encourages physical activity Practical feasibility ·
Access to physical activity or sports in the
community Social environment ·
Being accepted by peers ·
Being accepted by other parents Facility/program factors ·
Having a good trainer ·
Good communication between trainers/coaches ·
Training in small groups |
Information
from: (Verschuren et al, 2012, p. 490)
Personal factors
·
Some experienced difficulties developing the skills need to become
independent because their parents were overprotective
“Try a few times and then you will succeed. But
sometimes it might look like the world is gonna end, but for some reason, for
me I get over these things because I’ve been having CP for 13 years already so
I’m pretty used to it” (Shikako-Thomas et al, 2009, p.829 cited in Lindsay,
2015)
·
When it came to coping, youth demonstrated
resilience and strategies for maintain self-concept (Lindsay, 2015)
Mental Health
·
Experiences stress, depression and anxiety related to bullying from
peers at school and social isolation linked to bodily differences of living
with CP
·
Youth longed to be normal and were frustrated with having to cope with
bodily differences (Lindsay, 2015)
Facilities and services
·
Some reported social and health services enhanced their participation
while other lacked services
·
Public transport, along with lack of accessible environments at school
and in the community, influences the youth’s ability to go out and/or socialise
with peers
·
Most important barrier is the availability of education and training
·
Most daily encountered barrier was home design (Nobakht et al., 2013)
Policies
·
Availability of facilities and administration of policies were not
sufficient to meet the needs of children with disabilities
·
Policy makers and responsible organization need to develop their
policy to integrate children with CP into society (Nobakht et al., 2013)
Participation
·
Youth described the importance of receiving support from family
members to help them managing their CP. These supports were invaluable in
building self-confidence and encouraging youth to participate in the community
·
At the same time, peers and family could act as barriers to participation
·
E.g. peers were commonly unsupportive of youth with CP and parents
were sometimes described as overprotective
·
Many were able to participate in leisure and recreational activities,
which helped them to maintain social normalcy
·
Others found it difficult to take part due to functional limitations
and/or inaccessible facilitates
·
Other found activities they could take part in (Lindsay, 2015)
School and learning
·
Frequently encountered discrimination and lack of understanding about
CP among classmates and teachers
·
Often affected their ability to feel included and participate in
school and extracurricular activities
·
Some mentioned difficulties with schoolwork itself, while others felt
frustrated by lack of support in the school system (Lindsay, 2015)
Work and civic engagement
·
Some had employment experience, while others reported difficulties
getting job due to fatigue, lack of independence, self-care skills or
inaccessible transportation
·
Described future aspirations for education and work, but anticipated
needing support to obtain these goals (Lindsay, 2015)
Verschuren et al’s (2016) paper presents the
first CP-specific physical activity and exercise recommendations. The
recommendations are based on a comprehensive review and analysis of the
literature, expert opinion, and extensive clinical experience. These
recommendations are based on evidence from randomized controlled trials and
observational studies involving children, adolescents, and adults with CP, and
previous guidelines for the general population. The authors intend for the recommendations
to be used to guide healthcare providers on exercise and daily physical
activity prescription for individuals with CP.
Recommended daily physical activity level
Moderate to Vigorous
·
Frequency: more than 5 days per week
·
Intensity: moderate to vigorous intensity
·
Time: 60 mins
·
Type: a variety of activities
Sedentary
·
Time: Less than 2 hours a day or break up sitting for 2 minutes for every
30-60 minutes
·
Type: Non-occupational, leisure-time sedentary activities such as watching
television, using a computer and/or playing video games
Recommended exercise prescription
Cardiorespiratory (aerobic) exercise
·
Frequency: Start with 1-2 sessions a week and gradually
progress to 2 sessions a week
·
Intensity: More than 60% of peak heart rate, or more than
40% of the heart rate reserve, or between 46% and 90% VO2peak
·
Time: A minimum time of 20 minutes per session, and for at least 8 or 16
consecutive weeks, depending on frequency (2 or 3 times a week).
·
Type: Regular, purposeful exercise that involves major muscle groups and is
continuous and rhythmic in nature
Resistance exercise
·
Frequency: 2 to 4 times a week on non-consecutive days
·
Intensity: 1 to 3 sets of 6 to 15 repetitions of 50 to 85%
repetition maximum
·
Time: no specific duration of training has been identified for
effectiveness. Training period should last at least 12 to 16 consecutive weeks
·
Type: Progression in mode from primarily single-joint, machine-based
resistance exercises to machine plus free-weight, multi-joint (and
closed-kinetic chain) resistance exercises. Single-joint resistance training
may be more effective for very weak muscles or for children, adolescents or
adults who tend to compensate when performing multi-joint exercises, or at the beginning
of the training
(Verschuren et al,
2016, p.803)
Aerobic exercise
Systematic review (and AACPDM report)
·
Roger’s et al
(2008) assessed the evidence
regarding the effectiveness of aerobic training interventions for children with
cerebral palsy (target population included children with any severity of
cerebral palsy, aged 2 to 17 years).
·
Included 13 studies of a mixture of designs: pre-test/post-test,
cohort studies, RCTs, single subject designs, case studies and a case report.
Included studies |
|
Number of studies (type of study) |
Methods |
1 (RCT) |
Control group received the same as the experimental group but did not
participate in the additional training sessions |
1 (RCT) |
Added ‘active encouragement’ to the exercise sessions for the
experimental group |
1 (Cohort) |
Used participants that dropped out or did not begin training as the
control group |
5 (Pre-test/Post-test) |
Compared of a single group using a variety of aerobic exercise
programs ranging from games to bicycle goniometry |
·
Benefits of
aerobic exercise for those with
disabilities include increased cardiovascular capacity and endurance, weight
management and lower blood lipid level, preservation of bone mass and overall
maintenance function
·
Complications
- no reports of increased spasticity, medical problems or the occurrence of
musculoskeletal trauma in any of the studies reviewed
·
Limited evidence suggests that aerobic exercise training program
demonstrate improvements in physiological measures of aerobic fitness
·
Author’s
conclusion – evidence suggests
that aerobic exercise with children with CP can improve physiological outcomes,
but the influence of these changes on outcomes representing activity and
participation are unknown
Spasticity Management: Botulinum Toxin
(Botox)
·
Reason
for Use of Botox: Botulinum Toxin is used to Reduce Increased Tone in Selected
Muscles, to Enable the Establishment of New Movement Patterns and Reduction in
Contractures (Cosgrove et al, 1994)
·
How
it Works: Botox is taken up by Endocytosis at the Nerve Terminals Blocking
the Release of Synaptic Vessels. This in Turn, Blocks the Action of the Synapse
of the Neuromuscular Junction for Several Months Until a New Neuromuscular
Junction is Formed
·
Evidence-Base:
The
Short-Term Results have been Extremely Encouraging for Improving Gait in
Children with Spastic Hemiplegia and Diplegia, Improving Upper Limb Function
and Management of Hip Pain (Koman et al, 2000)
Neurodevelopmental
Therapy (NDT)
·
Bobath
Approach: Suggests
Moving and Handling in a Certain Way could Inhibit Spastic Patterns of Movement,
allowing the Emergence of Normal Patterns.
·
It is a Type of Specialised Handling with Control being
given at Key Points to Inhibit Spasticity and Guide Movements – Taught to
Parents to Continue Rehab at Home
·
Rationale: The Rationale Behind the Bobath Approach was Developed
around the Idea that Brain Lesions Result in the Release of Abnormal Movement
Patterns of Coordination and Abnormal Postural Tone (Bobath, 1994)
·
The Theoretical Hierarchical Rationale for the Bobath
Approach has been Refuted by More Recent Studies on the Nervous System. For
Example, a Review of the Evidence of NDT by Butler and Darrah (2001) Concluded
that there was No Consistent Evidence that Facilitated More Normal Motor
Development
Strength
Training
·
There has been Growing Evidence of the Benefits of
Strength Training Programmes in Improving Functional Ability in Individuals
with Cerebral Palsy
·
Rationale:
Improve
Muscle Strength and Muscle Endurance to Help with Activities of Daily Living,
as well as Allowing for Rest Days for the Muscles to Relax
·
Evidence
Base: A
Study Conducted by Dodd et al (2003) Demonstrated Gains in Strength and
Speed of Walking in Individuals with Cerebral Palsy. A Qualitative Study
Conducted by McBurney et al (2003) Identified that Children Perceived
Themselves to be Stronger, More Flexible, Able to Negotiate the Stairs More Easily
and Had a Greater Sense of Wellbeing. Large Improvements in Strength
·
NICE
Guidelines: Study
on Progressive Resistance Training Group for Children with Cerebral Palsy
Showed an Increase in Strength, Posture, Flexibility and Gait. Some Strength
Exercises included Working on Knee Flexion and Knee Extension.
Assistive
Technology – Orthotics
·
Orthotics offers a Conservative Approach to Prevent
Deformity, Improve Joint Alignment and Biomechanics and Improve Functions in
Individuals with CP
·
The Orthotics Provide the Individual with Intimate
Control of Joints (Morris, 2002)
·
Evidence
Base: Lower
Limb Orthotics can be used to Provide Stability in Standing Transfers,
Clearance in the Swing Phase of the Gait Cycle and Support for Individuals with
Limited Walking Ability due to Cerebral Palsy. However, Orthoses need to be
Used with Care as Excessive Use can Lead to Immobility and Consequent Muscle
Weakness and Atrophy (Shortland et al, 2002)
·
Types of Orthoses include Hip and Spine Orthoses (HASO)
to Control Hip and Spine Positioning and Thoraco-lumbosacral Orthoses (TLSO) to
Control Spinal Curvature during Growth
·
Bobath KA (1984) Neurological Basis for the
Treatment of Cerebral Palsy. Clinics in Developmental Medicine, no 75, 2nd
Edition, London: MacKeith Press
·
Butler C, Darrah J (2001) Effects of
Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT) for Cerebral Palsy: An AACPDM Evidence
Report. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 43: 778-790
·
Calderón, C.B. (2018) ‘Design, Development and Evaluation
of a Robotic Platform for Gait Rehabilitation and Training in Patients with
Cerebral Palsy’, Research Gate. [Illus.] Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326345460_Design_Development_and_Evaluation_of_a_Robotic_Platform_for_Gait_Rehabilitation_and_Training_in_Patients_with_Cerebral_Palsy.
(Accessed: 2 July 2020).
·
Cerebral Palsy UK (2020) WE SUPPORT PEOPLE
WHO ARE AFFECTED BY CEREBRAL PALSY. Available at: https://www.cerebralpalsy.org.uk/#.
(Accessed: 2 July 2020).
·
Cosgrove AP, Corry IS, Graham HK (1994) Botulinum
Toxin in the Management of the Lower Limb in Cerebral Palsy. Developmental
Medicine and Child Neurology 36: 386-396
· Dodd JK, Taylor FN, Graham HK (2003) A Randomised Clinical Trial of Strength Training in Young People with Cerebral Palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 652-657·
·
Koman LA, Mooney JF, Paterson-Smith BP et al
(2000) Botulinum Toxin Type a Neuromuscular Blockade in the Treatment of
Lower Extremity Spasticity in Cerebral Palsy: A Randomised, Double-Blind,
Placebo-Controlled Trial. Journal of Paediatric Orthopaedics 20: 108-115
·
Krigger, K.W. (2006) ‘Cerebral Palsy: An
Overview’, American Family Physician, 73(1), pp. 91-100.
·
Lindsay, S. (2016) ‘Child and youth experiences
and perspectives of cerebral palsy: a qualitative systematic review’, Child:
care, health and development, 42(2), pp. 153-157. [Online] Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cch.12309?casa_token=lJ2WQXkgC9QAAAAA%3Au6cUSQj7iOJgFHO7phLJ_ZPbCNbkrIqMOP3LsAuxJbmImwGWIamhd5Wn0RNnvlcDOZxt53uiqz00w1Q.
(Accessed: 2 July 2020).
·
McBurney H, Taylor NF, Dodd KJ et al (2003) A
Qualitative Analysis of the Benefits of Strength Training for Young People with
Cerebral Palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 45: 658-633
· Morris C (2002) A Review of the Efficacy of Lower Limb Orthoses Used for Cerebral Palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 44: 205-211
·
Nobakht, Z., Rassafiani, M., Rezasoltani, P.,
Yazdani, F. (2013) ‘Environmental barriers to social participation of children
with cerebral palsy in Tehran’, Inner Rehabilitation Journal ,11.
·
Physiopedia (2020) Cerebral Palsy Introduction. Available at: https://www.physio-pedia.com/Cerebral_Palsy_Introduction#cite_note-2. (Accessed: 5 July
2020).
·
Rogers, A., Furler, B.L., Brinks, S. and Darrah,
J. (2008) ‘A systematic review of the effectiveness of aerobic exercise
interventions for children with cerebral palsy: an AACPDM evidence report’, Development
Medicine and Child Neurology, 50, pp. 808-814.
·
Sewell, M.D., Eastwood, D.M. and Wimalasundera,
N. (2014) ‘Managing common symptoms of cerebral palsy in children’, BMJ,
349. [Online] Available at: https://www.bmj.com/content/349/bmj.g5474.
(Accessed: 2 July 2020).
·
Verschuren, O., Wiart, L., Hermans, D. and Katelaar,
M. (2012) ‘Identification of Facilitators and Barriers to Physical Activity in
Children and Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy’, The Journal of Pediatrics,
161(3), pp. 488-494.
·
Vershchuren, O., Peterson, M.D., Balemnans, A.C.J. and Hurvits, E. (2016)
‘Exercise and physical activity recommendations for people with cerebral
palsy’, Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 58(8), pp.798-808.
[Online] Available at: https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.uea.idm.oclc.org/doi/full/10.1111/dmcn.13053. (Accessed: 7 July
2020).
· World Cerebral Palsy Day (2014) WCPD What is CP poster English USA. Available at: https://worldcpday.org/tools/#1493959825296-f73f835a-071e. (Accessed: 2 July 2020).
Comments
Post a Comment